<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>randallagordon.com &#187; The Things I Think About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randallagordon.com/blog/category/the-things-i-think-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randallagordon.com/blog</link>
	<description>Home of the Ranbot 3000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Things I Think About… Morality, Ethics and Context: For Photographers and You</title>
		<link>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2010/05/07/the-things-i-think-about%e2%80%a6-morality-ethics-and-context-for-photographers-and-you/</link>
		<comments>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2010/05/07/the-things-i-think-about%e2%80%a6-morality-ethics-and-context-for-photographers-and-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randallagordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Things I Think About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallagordon.com/blog/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When issues of morality and ethics pop up in conversation, many people have a tendency to jump to examples painted purely in black and white. I&#8217;m guilty of it myself. While such can be useful as a thought experiment, most examples tend to ignore something very important: context. Without context, useful information is immediately lost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When issues of morality and ethics pop up in conversation, many people have a tendency to jump to examples painted purely in black and white. I&#8217;m guilty of it myself. While such can be useful as a thought experiment, most examples tend to ignore something very important: <em>context</em>.</p>
<p>Without context, useful information is immediately lost which often leads to logical fallacies. Here&#8217;s one of the most succinct examples I&#8217;m aware of, provided by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy">Fallacy article on Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Argument</em>: Cutting people is a crime. Surgeons cut people. Therefore, surgeons are criminals.</p>
<p><em>Problem</em>: Cutting people is only sometimes a crime.</p></blockquote>
<p>Without context, poor conclusions result. Consider the following example which photographers will immediately relate to how one exposes a photo.</p>
<blockquote><p>Imagine a piece of paper divided in half. One half is stark white and the other is pitch black.</p>
<p>Now shine a light on that piece of paper.</p>
<p>A dim light will ensure that black is indeed black—but now the white side appears gray.</p>
<p>A bright light will ensure that white is indeed white—but now the black side appears gray.</p></blockquote>
<p>The light is <em>context</em>. Vary the brightness of the light and you&#8217;ll get different outcomes. Without light we are lost in the darkness, able only to interpret situations with simplified thought experiments held in isolation. Always consider the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2010/05/07/the-things-i-think-about%e2%80%a6-morality-ethics-and-context-for-photographers-and-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Things I Think About&#8230; Manufacturing 2.0: The Economy And You</title>
		<link>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2009/01/24/the-things-i-think-about-manufacturing-20-the-economy-and-you/</link>
		<comments>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2009/01/24/the-things-i-think-about-manufacturing-20-the-economy-and-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randallagordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Things I Think About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallagordon.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyday new research in the fields of nanotechnology and synthetic biology, among many others, bring us closer to huge shifts in how we manufacture many of the goods and products we use on a daily basis. Sure, it won&#8217;t be anytime soon that we have goodies like universal molecular assemblers that can produce any structure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyday new research in the fields of nanotechnology and synthetic biology, among many others, bring us closer to huge shifts in how we manufacture many of the goods and products we use on a daily basis. Sure, it won&#8217;t be anytime soon that we have goodies like universal <a title="Wikipedia: Molecular assembler" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_assembler">molecular assemblers</a> that can produce any structure we can give it a blueprint for. And while we could see <a title="Drew Endy: The Implications of Synthetic Biology" href="http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/363">synthetic biology</a> bring us industrial scale biofuel production in the next several years, it could be multiple decades before the technology is applied to manufacturing complex structures of molecules and polymers. But I find it interesting to think about the implications.</p>
<p><span id="more-20"></span></p>
<p>In the near term, if the promise of synthetic organisms which <a title="Craig Venter: Genomics vs. Oil Economics" href="http://earth2tech.com/2008/02/26/craig-venter-genomics-vs-oil-economics/">turn carbon dioxide into octane and coal into methane</a> comes to pass, we may have solved most of our energy problems. This one move forward will eventually come to be known as a baby step in the field of synthetic biology. But it could take a major cut out of the cost of energy at the same time as providing a way to offset the emissions produced in the burning of the fuels. Lower cost of energy results in lower cost of manufacturing which translates into lower cost of goods (or higher profit margins! *bah dum, chhh*).</p>
<p>And not to mention, as we move toward a society even more permeated by electronics, we&#8217;ll need fewer and fewer physical goods. While it has been a long time coming, eventually there will be a technology which properly replaces paper. A big portion of the pulp product industry could literally go down the&#8230;well you know. And these electronics are sipping fewer and fewer watts each day. That&#8217;s a huge contributor to lowering costs—simple energy conservation.</p>
<p>But further out—fifty, a hundred or more years down the line—what happens as technological advances in all fields bring us closer to dropping the cost of energy close to zero? Solar, tidal, wind, bio&#8230;fuel.  Energy, energy everywhere. Now combine that with manufacturing techniques which could literally pull much of the material necessary for producing goods straight out of thin air—that&#8217;s right, carbon dioxide to use in the production of carbon polymers. <a title="Wikipedia: Graphene" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene">Graphene</a> for our electronics, <a title="Wikipedia: Carbon nanotube" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_nanotube">nanotubes</a> for durable structures&#8230;</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said, these technologies won&#8217;t come to their full potential for many decades, potentially centuries, but their implications could be huge. The future could bring us a world where it costs nothing to make anything. Realistically, we&#8217;ve got the same constraints we&#8217;ve always had. We&#8217;re still limited by what energy and raw materials we can pull from our environment. But the solar system has this wonderful nuclear oven called the sun that puts out massive amounts of energy. And if we run out of materials here on Earth, there&#8217;s always the asteroid belt.</p>
<p>So thinking way out—way, way out—into the future, assuming the technology comes to pass, my questions are&#8230;  What are the implications of being able to manufacturing anything at no cost? How does the economy change? Does our entire economy become based on intellectual property? Will the open source and collaborative communities provide a truly free world in all senses of the word?</p>
<p>I have my own thoughts on how to begin answering these questions, but, of course, they&#8217;re only beginnings. Only time will tell and we have a <em>lot</em> left to learn in the mean time. But I am interested in what you come up with in answer to these questions. Leave a comment and let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2009/01/24/the-things-i-think-about-manufacturing-20-the-economy-and-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Things I Think About&#8230; Thoughts On Cash Donations&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2009/01/02/thoughts-on-cash-donations/</link>
		<comments>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2009/01/02/thoughts-on-cash-donations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randallagordon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Things I Think About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallagordon.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money has no inherent value. Money has only the value that is given to it by its holder. Donate time and you retain the ability to ensure that that time has value. Donate money and you&#8217;re passing that responsibility on to the recipient. If the recipient is irresponsible with it, then you have effectively given [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money has no inherent value. Money has only the value that is given to it by its holder. Donate time and you retain the ability to ensure that that time has value. Donate money and you&#8217;re passing that responsibility on to the recipient. If the recipient is irresponsible with it, then you have effectively given no value; the value is only in your own eyes, as you are the one who has given value to the money, not the recipient.</p>
<p>Does this mean you shouldn&#8217;t donate money? That depends on the recipient. Simply be sure to do your own due diligence to determine if your donation will be used wisely or squandered away. Do not donate blindly.</p>
<p>Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime.</p>
<p>Donate cash and a man may eat for a day. Donate your knowledge and a man can find his way so long as he is willing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://randallagordon.com/blog/2009/01/02/thoughts-on-cash-donations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
